Skip to content

Transparency & Testing Methodology

At Prefrontal Profit, we believe transparency isn’t optional—it’s foundational to trust.


Every platform we review undergoes our proprietary Attention Protocol methodology:

  • Ping tests and API timing measurements
  • Order execution speed analysis
  • Sample size: Minimum 100 executions
  • Environment: Live trading accounts ($10K+)
  • Heatmap analysis of UI elements
  • Information density calculations
  • Friction point scoring system
  • Before/after usability comparisons
  • Click-count methodology
  • Time-to-execution measurements
  • Cognitive decision-point mapping
  • User journey analysis framework

Testing Standards

  • Test Duration: Minimum 30 days per platform
  • Account Size: $10,000+ live capital
  • Data Points: 500+ per review
  • Retest Cycle: Quarterly for top platforms

💰 Affiliate Relationships & Commission Disclosure

Section titled “💰 Affiliate Relationships & Commission Disclosure”

We earn commissions from some platforms featured on this site when you sign up through our links. These affiliate relationships help fund our extensive testing operations.

Typical Commission Structures by Category:

Section titled “Typical Commission Structures by Category:”
CategoryCommission RangeStructure
Prop Trading Firms$50-300 per signupOne-time CPA
Brokers (India)₹500-2000 per accountOne-time CPA
Crypto Exchanges10-40% revenue shareOngoing commission
Trading Journals$20-50 per signupOne-time CPA
Algo Platforms20-30% revenue shareRecurring commission

Important These are approximate ranges. Actual commissions vary by platform, user activity, and partnership terms.


Rankings - Determined solely by our Attention Protocol scores
Ratings - Based on quantitative performance metrics
Negative Reviews - We publish critical reviews even when it costs us commissions
Testing Methodology - Same rigorous process for all platforms

  • We never promote platforms we haven’t personally tested
  • Commission rates do NOT influence our rankings
  • We regularly test non-affiliate platforms for comparison
  • Negative reviews stay published even if it costs us money
  • All testing data is available on request

🔬 Platforms Tested WITHOUT Affiliate Relationships

Section titled “🔬 Platforms Tested WITHOUT Affiliate Relationships”

We regularly test platforms with which we have no financial relationship. This proves our methodology works independently of commission incentives:

Prop Firms

  • Topstep (tested Q4 2025)
  • The 5%ers (tested Q1 2026)
  • Blue Guardian (tested Q1 2026)

Brokers

  • Kotak Securities (tested Q4 2025)
  • ICICI Direct (tested Q1 2026)

Exchanges

  • Gemini (tested Q4 2025)
  • KuCoin (tested Q1 2026)

This proves: Our testing methodology and rankings are independent of financial incentives.


For each platform review, we collect and document:

  • Execution latency data (millisecond-level precision)
  • UI friction scores (quantified decision points)
  • Feature availability matrices
  • Cost calculations (true cost at various volume levels)
  • Uptime monitoring (30-day reliability tracking)
  • Screenshots of testing setups
  • Performance data exports

Serious traders can request our raw testing data for any platform we’ve reviewed. Contact us with:

  • Platform name
  • Specific metrics you’re interested in
  • Intended use (personal research, academic, etc.)

We’ll provide anonymized datasets within 7 business days.


⚖️ How Commissions Might Influence Content

Section titled “⚖️ How Commissions Might Influence Content”

We’re honest about potential biases:

Where Commissions MAY Have Subtle Effects:

Section titled “Where Commissions MAY Have Subtle Effects:”
  • Content Volume - We may write more in-depth content about platforms with better partnerships
  • Update Frequency - Affiliate platforms might get retested more frequently
  • Comparison Visibility - Platforms we partner with may appear in more comparison articles

✅ Include non-affiliate alternatives in every comparison
✅ Clearly label all affiliate links
✅ Publish “Hall of Shame” reviews for platforms that fail our tests
✅ Annual third-party audit of our ranking methodology


Trading involves substantial risk of loss.

  • We are not financial advisors
  • Past performance does not guarantee future results
  • Platform performance varies by user, market conditions, and trading strategy
  • Our testing represents our specific experience and methodology
  • You should conduct your own due diligence before committing capital

Think we got something wrong? We want to know.

If you can prove our testing methodology is flawed or our rankings are commission-biased, we’ll:

  1. Publish a full correction
  2. Redo the affected testing
  3. Update our methodology documentation
  4. Compensate for wasted reader time

Current Testing Queue (Updated March 2026):

  • ✅ FTMO - Retest scheduled Q2 2026
  • ✅ Zerodha - Quarterly monitoring active
  • ✅ Binance - Monthly uptime tracking
  • 🔄 TradingView - Under evaluation
  • 🔄 Coinbase - 30-day test in progress

Public Roadmap: We maintain a public testing calendar showing which platforms are currently under evaluation.


Most review sites hide their incentives. We believe you deserve to know:

  • How we make money
  • How we test platforms
  • What biases might exist
  • Where our data comes from

Trust is earned through radical transparency.


Questions About Our Process?

We’re here to clarify anything. Transparency only works if you can actually access the information you need.

Contact us: contact@prefrontalprofit.com


Last Updated: March 19, 2026
Next Methodology Audit: June 2026